CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X vs Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz

Key Findings

  • The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X leads in single-threaded performance by up to 73.0%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz shows superior performance with a 8.9% advantage
  • The Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz has the highest core count with 18 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

AMD Ryzen 5 9600X

Desktop
Release Date
Q3 2024
Market Position
338th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs23rd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs113th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz

Desktop
Release Date
Q4 2019
Market Position
287th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs725th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs89th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

9600X
4,587
3.00GHz
2,652

Multi-Thread Performance

9600X
30,100
3.00GHz
32,787

Specifications: AMD Ryzen 5 9600X vs Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz

💻CPU Model
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X
9600X
Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz
3.00GHz
🔄Other Names
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X 6-Core Processor
9600X
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz, Intel Core i9-10980XE CPU @ 3.00GHz
3.00GHz
⚡Base Clock
3.9 GHz
9600X
3.0 GHz
3.00GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
5.4 GHz
9600X
4.8 GHz
3.00GHz
💻Cores/Threads
6 Threads: 12
9600X
18 Threads: 36
3.00GHz
🔌Socket
AM5
9600X
FCLGA2066
3.00GHz
⚡TDP
65 W
9600X
165 W
3.00GHz
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 32 MB
9600X
L1 Instruction Cache: 18 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 18 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 18 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 25 MB
3.00GHz

The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X and Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz compete in the Desktop segment. The AMD Ryzen 5 9600X shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core i9-10980XE @ 3.00GHz drawing more power under load (165W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.