CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs Intel Core i3-1305U

Key Findings

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 10.7%
In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U shows superior performance with a 184.3% advantage
The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U has the highest core count with 8 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2023

Market Position

467th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs246th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs63rd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Core i3-1305U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2023

Market Position

1296th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs403rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs301st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

7840U

3,602

i3-1305U

3,255

Multi-Thread Performance

7840U

24,990

i3-1305U

8,789

Specifications: AMD Ryzen 7 7840U vs Intel Core i3-1305U

💻CPU Model

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U

7840U

Intel Core i3-1305U

i3-1305U

🔄Other Names

AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U w/ Radeon(TM) 780M Graphics, AMD Ryzen 7 7840U with Radeon 780M Graphics

7840U

13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-1305U

i3-1305U

⚡Base Clock

3.3 GHz

7840U

N/A

i3-1305U

🚀Turbo Clock

5.1 GHz

7840U

N/A

i3-1305U

💻Cores/Threads

8 Threads: 16

7840U

N/A

i3-1305U

🔌Socket

N/A

7840U

FCBGA1744

i3-1305U

⚡TDP

30 W

7840U

15 W

i3-1305U

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB

7840U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1280 KBL3 Cache: 10 MB

i3-1305U

The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U and Intel Core i3-1305U compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 7840U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i3-1305U takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 7 7840U drawing more power under load (30W vs 15W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.