CPU Comparison: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Key Findings

  • The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D leads in single-threaded performance by up to 8.3%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX shows superior performance with a 23.9% advantage
  • The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has the highest core count with 12 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D

Desktop
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
214th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs33rd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs61st fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Desktop
Release Date
Q4 2023
Market Position
143rd fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs78th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs38th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

9800X3D
4,431
7945WX
4,091

Multi-Thread Performance

9800X3D
40,043
7945WX
49,607

Specifications: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

💻CPU Model
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D
9800X3D
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
7945WX
🔄Other Names
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D 8-Core Processor
9800X3D
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX 12-Cores
7945WX
⚡Base Clock
4.7 GHz
9800X3D
4.7 GHz
7945WX
🚀Turbo Clock
5.2 GHz
9800X3D
5.3 GHz
7945WX
💻Cores/Threads
8 Threads: 16
9800X3D
12 Threads: 24
7945WX
🔌Socket
AM5
9800X3D
sTR5
7945WX
⚡TDP
120 W
9800X3D
350 W
7945WX
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 96 MB
9800X3D
L1 Instruction Cache: 12 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 12 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 12 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB
7945WX

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX compete in the Desktop segment. The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX drawing more power under load (350W vs 120W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.