CPU Comparison: Intel Core i5-14600K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Key Findings

The Intel Core i5-14600K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 84.8%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i5-14600K shows superior performance with a 70.0% advantage
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 has the highest core count with 12 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i5-14600K

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2023

Market Position

218th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs44th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs63rd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920

Desktop

Release Date

Q3 2017

Market Position

534th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs1046th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs181st fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i5-14600K

4,281

1920

2,316

Multi-Thread Performance

i5-14600K

39,246

1920

23,088

Specifications: Intel Core i5-14600K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i5-14600K

i5-14600K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920

1920

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-14600KF, Intel Core i5-14600KF

i5-14600K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X 12-Core Processor

1920

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i5-14600K

3.5 GHz

1920

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i5-14600K

4.0 GHz

1920

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i5-14600K

12 Threads: 24

1920

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i5-14600K

sTR4

1920

⚡TDP

125 W

i5-14600K

180 W

1920

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 6 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 6 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 6 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 24 MB

i5-14600K

L1 Instruction Cache: 12 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 12 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 12 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 32 MB

1920

The Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i5-14600K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920 drawing more power under load (180W vs 125W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.