CPU Comparison: Intel Core i7-14700F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Key Findings

The Intel Core i7-14700F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 89.2%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior performance with a 58.1% advantage
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X has the highest core count with 16 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i7-14700F

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

186th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs40th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs53rd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

Desktop

Release Date

Q3 2017

Market Position

392nd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs1103rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs134th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i7-14700F

4,302

1950X

2,274

Multi-Thread Performance

i7-14700F

43,649

1950X

27,613

Specifications: Intel Core i7-14700F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i7-14700F

i7-14700F

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X

1950X

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700F, Intel Core i7-14700F

i7-14700F

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core Processor

1950X

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i7-14700F

3.4 GHz

1950X

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i7-14700F

4.0 GHz

1950X

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i7-14700F

16 Threads: 32

1950X

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i7-14700F

sTR4

1950X

⚡TDP

65 W

i7-14700F

180 W

1950X

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 33 MB

i7-14700F

L1 Instruction Cache: 16 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 16 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 16 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 32 MB

1950X

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X drawing more power under load (180W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.