CPU Comparison: Intel Core i7-14700F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X

Key Findings

The Intel Core i7-14700F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 86.1%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior performance with a 68.7% advantage
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X has the highest core count with 32 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i7-14700F

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

186th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs40th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs53rd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2018

Market Position

442nd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs1052nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs148th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i7-14700F

4,302

2990X

2,312

Multi-Thread Performance

i7-14700F

43,649

2990X

25,874

Specifications: Intel Core i7-14700F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i7-14700F

i7-14700F

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X

2990X

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700F, Intel Core i7-14700F

i7-14700F

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X 32-Core Processor

2990X

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i7-14700F

3.4 GHz

2990X

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i7-14700F

4.2 GHz

2990X

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i7-14700F

32 Threads: 64

2990X

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i7-14700F

TR4

2990X

⚡TDP

65 W

i7-14700F

250 W

2990X

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 33 MB

i7-14700F

L1 Instruction Cache: 32 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 32 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 32 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB

2990X

The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990X drawing more power under load (250W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.