CPU Comparison: Intel Core i7-14700F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Key Findings
- The Intel Core i7-14700F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 5.0%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX shows superior performance with a 37.4% advantage
- The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX has the highest core count with 16 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core i7-14700F
Release Date
Q1 2024
Market Position
186th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs40th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs53rd fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
Release Date
Q4 2023
Market Position
90th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs76th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs23rd fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
i7-14700F
4,302
7955WX
4,096
Multi-Thread Performance
i7-14700F
43,649
7955WX
59,968
Specifications: Intel Core i7-14700F vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
💻CPU Model
Intel Core i7-14700F
i7-14700F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
7955WX
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700F, Intel Core i7-14700F
i7-14700F
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores
7955WX
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
i7-14700F
4.5 GHz
7955WX
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
i7-14700F
5.3 GHz
7955WX
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
i7-14700F
16 Threads: 32
7955WX
🔌Socket
FCLGA1700
i7-14700F
sTR5
7955WX
âš¡TDP
65 W
i7-14700F
350 W
7955WX
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 33 MB
i7-14700F
L1 Instruction Cache: 16 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 16 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 16 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB
7955WX
The Intel Core i7-14700F and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX drawing more power under load (350W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.