CPU Comparison: Intel Core i7-14700F vs Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz
Key Findings
- The Intel Core i7-14700F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 21.6%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior performance with a 74.6% advantage
- The Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz has the highest core count with 8 cores
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core i7-14700F
Release Date
Q1 2024
Market Position
186th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs40th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs53rd fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz
Release Date
Q2 2021
Market Position
466th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs264th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs159th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
i7-14700F
4,302
3.50GHz
3,537
Multi-Thread Performance
i7-14700F
43,649
3.50GHz
24,995
Specifications: Intel Core i7-14700F vs Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz
💻CPU Model
Intel Core i7-14700F
i7-14700F
Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz
3.50GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-14700F, Intel Core i7-14700F
i7-14700F
11th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz, 11th Gen Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz
3.50GHz
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
i7-14700F
3.5 GHz
3.50GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
i7-14700F
5.3 GHz
3.50GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
i7-14700F
8 Threads: 16
3.50GHz
🔌Socket
FCLGA1700
i7-14700F
FCLGA1200
3.50GHz
âš¡TDP
65 W
i7-14700F
125 W
3.50GHz
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 33 MB
i7-14700F
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 16 MB
3.50GHz
The Intel Core i7-14700F and Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i7-14700F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core i9-11900KF @ 3.50GHz drawing more power under load (125W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.