CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-13900F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Key Findings
- The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 11.9%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K shows superior performance with a 21.0% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core i9-13900F
Release Date
Q1 2023
Market Position
134th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs34th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs34th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
Release Date
Q4 2024
Market Position
80th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs2nd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs20th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
i9-13900F
4,429
265K
4,956
Multi-Thread Performance
i9-13900F
51,218
265K
61,964
Specifications: Intel Core i9-13900F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
💻CPU Model
Intel Core i9-13900F
i9-13900F
Intel Core Ultra 7 265K
265K
🔄Other Names
13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-13900F, 13th Gen Intel Core i9-13900F
i9-13900F
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 265KF
265K
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
i9-13900F
N/A
265K
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
i9-13900F
N/A
265K
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
i9-13900F
N/A
265K
🔌Socket
FCLGA1700
i9-13900F
FCLGA1851
265K
âš¡TDP
65 W
i9-13900F
125 W
265K
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
i9-13900F
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 30 MB
265K
The Intel Core i9-13900F and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.
For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K drawing more power under load (125W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.