CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Key Findings

All CPUs perform similarly in single-threaded tasks
Multi-threaded performance is comparable among all CPUs

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

76th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs19th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2024

Market Position

80th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs20th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900

4,870

265KF

4,956

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900

62,393

265KF

61,964

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900 vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i9-14900

i9-14900

Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF

265KF

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900KS, Intel Core i9-14900KS

i9-14900

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 265KF

265KF

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i9-14900

N/A

265KF

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i9-14900

N/A

265KF

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i9-14900

N/A

265KF

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i9-14900

FCLGA1851

265KF

⚡TDP

150 W

i9-14900

125 W

265KF

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

i9-14900

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 30 MB

265KF

The Intel Core i9-14900 and Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core i9-14900 drawing more power under load (150W vs 125W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.