CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900F vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core i9-14900F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 62.9%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior performance with a 44.8% advantage
  • The AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT has the highest core count with 12 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900F

Desktop
Release Date
Q1 2024
Market Position
155th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs32nd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs42nd fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

Desktop
Release Date
Q3 2020
Market Position
292nd fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs637th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs90th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900F
4,472
3900XT
2,746

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900F
47,298
3900XT
32,666

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900F vs AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT

💻CPU Model
Intel Core i9-14900F
i9-14900F
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
3900XT
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900F
i9-14900F
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-Core Processor
3900XT
⚡Base Clock
N/A
i9-14900F
3.8 GHz
3900XT
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
i9-14900F
4.7 GHz
3900XT
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
i9-14900F
12 Threads: 24
3900XT
🔌Socket
FCLGA1700
i9-14900F
AM4
3900XT
⚡TDP
65 W
i9-14900F
105 W
3900XT
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
i9-14900F
L1 Instruction Cache: 12 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 12 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 12 x 512 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB
3900XT

The Intel Core i9-14900F and AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT drawing more power under load (105W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.