CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

Key Findings

The Intel Core i9-14900F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 15.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior performance with a 14.8% advantage

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900F

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

155th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs32nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs42nd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2022

Market Position

203rd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs148th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs56th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900F

4,472

Core

3,869

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900F

47,298

Core

41,209

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i9-14900F

i9-14900F

Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core

Core

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900F

i9-14900F

ARM Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core 0 MHz

Core

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i9-14900F

N/A

Core

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i9-14900F

N/A

Core

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i9-14900F

N/A

Core

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i9-14900F

N/A

Core

⚡TDP

65 W

i9-14900F

60 W

Core

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

i9-14900F

N/A

Core

The Intel Core i9-14900F and Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core i9-14900F drawing more power under load (65W vs 60W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.