CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Key Findings
- The Intel Core i9-14900F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 15.6%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior performance with a 14.8% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core i9-14900F
Release Date
Q1 2024
Market Position
155th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs32nd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs42nd fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Release Date
Q1 2022
Market Position
203rd fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs148th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs56th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
i9-14900F
4,472
Core
3,869
Multi-Thread Performance
i9-14900F
47,298
Core
41,209
Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
💻CPU Model
Intel Core i9-14900F
i9-14900F
Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core
Core
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900F
i9-14900F
ARM Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core 0 MHz
Core
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
i9-14900F
N/A
Core
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
i9-14900F
N/A
Core
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
i9-14900F
N/A
Core
🔌Socket
FCLGA1700
i9-14900F
N/A
Core
âš¡TDP
65 W
i9-14900F
60 W
Core
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
i9-14900F
N/A
Core
The Intel Core i9-14900F and Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the Apple M1 Ultra 20 Core takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core i9-14900F drawing more power under load (65W vs 60W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.