CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 10.8%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K shows superior performance with a 31.0% advantage

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900F

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

155th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs32nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs42nd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2024

Market Position

80th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs20th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900F

4,472

265K

4,956

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900F

47,298

265K

61,964

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i9-14900F

i9-14900F

Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

265K

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900F

i9-14900F

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 265KF

265K

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i9-14900F

N/A

265K

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i9-14900F

N/A

265K

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i9-14900F

N/A

265K

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i9-14900F

FCLGA1851

265K

⚡TDP

65 W

i9-14900F

125 W

265K

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

i9-14900F

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 3072 KBL3 Cache: 30 MB

265K

The Intel Core i9-14900F and Intel Core Ultra 7 265K compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K drawing more power under load (125W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.