CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core i9-14900F leads in single-threaded performance by up to 62.5%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior performance with a 69.7% advantage
The Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz has the highest core count with 14 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900F

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

155th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs32nd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs42nd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2020

Market Position

388th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs628th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs131st fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900F

4,472

3.30GHz

2,752

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900F

47,298

3.30GHz

27,866

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900F vs Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i9-14900F

i9-14900F

Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz

3.30GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900F

i9-14900F

Intel(R) Xeon(R) W-2275 CPU @ 3.30GHz

3.30GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i9-14900F

3.3 GHz

3.30GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i9-14900F

4.8 GHz

3.30GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i9-14900F

14 Threads: 28

3.30GHz

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i9-14900F

FCLGA2066

3.30GHz

⚡TDP

65 W

i9-14900F

165 W

3.30GHz

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

i9-14900F

L1 Instruction Cache: 14 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 14 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 14 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 19 MB

3.30GHz

The Intel Core i9-14900F and Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i9-14900F shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Xeon W-2275 @ 3.30GHz drawing more power under load (165W vs 65W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.