CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Key Findings

  • The Intel Core i9-14900K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 19.0%
  • In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core i9-14900K shows superior performance with a 25.8% advantage
  • The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX has the highest core count with 12 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900K

Desktop
Release Date
Q1 2024
Market Position
76th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs3rd fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs19th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

Desktop
Release Date
Q4 2023
Market Position
143rd fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs78th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs38th fastest in
1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900K
4,870
7945WX
4,091

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900K
62,393
7945WX
49,607

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX

💻CPU Model
Intel Core i9-14900K
i9-14900K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
7945WX
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900KS, Intel Core i9-14900KS
i9-14900K
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX 12-Cores
7945WX
⚡Base Clock
N/A
i9-14900K
4.7 GHz
7945WX
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
i9-14900K
5.3 GHz
7945WX
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
i9-14900K
12 Threads: 24
7945WX
🔌Socket
FCLGA1700
i9-14900K
sTR5
7945WX
⚡TDP
150 W
i9-14900K
350 W
7945WX
💾Cache
L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB
i9-14900K
L1 Instruction Cache: 12 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 12 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 12 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB
7945WX

The Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i9-14900K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX drawing more power under load (350W vs 150W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.