CPU Comparison: Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Key Findings

The Intel Core i9-14900K leads in single-threaded performance by up to 18.9%
Multi-threaded performance is comparable among all CPUs
The AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX has the highest core count with 16 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core i9-14900K

Desktop

Release Date

Q1 2024

Market Position

76th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs19th fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Desktop

Release Date

Q4 2023

Market Position

90th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs76th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs23rd fastest in

1398 Desktop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

i9-14900K

4,870

7955WX

4,096

Multi-Thread Performance

i9-14900K

62,393

7955WX

59,968

Specifications: Intel Core i9-14900K vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

💻CPU Model

Intel Core i9-14900K

i9-14900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

7955WX

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-14900KS, Intel Core i9-14900KS

i9-14900K

AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX 16-Cores

7955WX

⚡Base Clock

N/A

i9-14900K

4.5 GHz

7955WX

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

i9-14900K

5.3 GHz

7955WX

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

i9-14900K

16 Threads: 32

7955WX

🔌Socket

FCLGA1700

i9-14900K

sTR5

7955WX

⚡TDP

150 W

i9-14900K

350 W

7955WX

💾Cache

L1 Instruction Cache: 8 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 8 x 48 KBL2 Cache: 8 x 2048 KBL3 Cache: 36 MB

i9-14900K

L1 Instruction Cache: 16 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 16 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 16 x 1024 KBL3 Cache: 64 MB

7955WX

The Intel Core i9-14900K and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX compete in the Desktop segment. The Intel Core i9-14900K shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX drawing more power under load (350W vs 150W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.