CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 381.8%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 2216.9% advantage
The AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60 has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2009

Market Position

4195th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs3863rd fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs1120th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

QL-60

654

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

QL-60

652

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60

QL-60

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon Dual-Core QL-60, AMD Athlon(tm) X2 Dual-Core QL-60, AMD Athlon(tm)X2 DualCore QL-60

QL-60

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.9 GHz

QL-60

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

QL-60

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

QL-60

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

QL-60

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

35 W

QL-60

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 512 KB

QL-60

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Athlon 64 X2 QL-60 drawing more power under load (35W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.