CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon II Neo K125

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 411.5%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 4695.6% advantage
The AMD Athlon II Neo K125 has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD Athlon II Neo K125

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2010

Market Position

4582nd fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs3943rd fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1282nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

K125

616

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

K125

315

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD Athlon II Neo K125

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon II Neo K125

K125

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD Athlon(tm) II Neo K125 Processor

K125

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.7 GHz

K125

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

K125

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

K125

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

K125

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

12 W

K125

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

K125

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD Athlon II Neo K125 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD Athlon II Neo K125 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD Athlon II Neo K125 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD Athlon II Neo K125 drawing more power under load (12W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.