CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD E-240

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 681.9%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 7646.7% advantage
The AMD E-240 has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

AMD E-240

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2011

Market Position

4756th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4451st fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1364th fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

E-240

403

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

E-240

195

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs AMD E-240

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD E-240

E-240

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

AMD E-240 Processor

E-240

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.5 GHz

E-240

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

E-240

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

E-240

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FT1

E-240

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

18 W

E-240

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 512 KB

E-240

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and AMD E-240 compete in the Laptop segment. The AMD E-240 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the AMD E-240 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the AMD E-240 drawing more power under load (18W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.