CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Apple A18
Key Findings
- The Apple A18 leads in single-threaded performance by up to 32.1%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 16.0% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Apple A18
Release Date
Q3 2024
Market Position
1015th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs55th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs49th fastest in
1032 Mobile/Embedded CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
164U
3,151
A18
4,161
Multi-Thread Performance
164U
15,106
A18
13,028
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Apple A18
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Apple A18
A18
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Unknown CPU (iPhone17,2), Unknown CPU (iPhone17,1)
A18
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
A18
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
A18
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
N/A
A18
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
A18
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
8 W
A18
💾Cache
N/A
164U
N/A
A18
The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Apple A18 target different market segments. The Apple A18 leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.
For multi-threaded applications, the Apple A18 takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 8W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.
Similar to Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Lower Performance
AMD A10-4600M APU
Single-Thread Rating:1078
Multi-Thread Rating:1938
View Details
Lower Performance
Intel Celeron N2805 @ 1.46GHz
Single-Thread Rating:394
Multi-Thread Rating:335
View Details
Lower Performance
AMD A10 Micro-6700T APU
Single-Thread Rating:722
Multi-Thread Rating:1426
View Details