CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Apple A18 Pro
Key Findings
- The Apple A18 Pro leads in single-threaded performance by up to 32.1%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 16.0% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Apple A18 Pro
Release Date
Q3 2024
Market Position
1015th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs55th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs49th fastest in
1032 Mobile/Embedded CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
164U
3,151
Pro
4,161
Multi-Thread Performance
164U
15,106
Pro
13,028
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Apple A18 Pro
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Apple A18 Pro
Pro
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Unknown CPU (iPhone17,2), Unknown CPU (iPhone17,1)
Pro
⚡Base Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
Pro
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
Pro
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
N/A
Pro
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
Pro
⚡TDP
9 W
164U
8 W
Pro
💾Cache
N/A
164U
N/A
Pro
The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Apple A18 Pro target different market segments. The Apple A18 Pro leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.
For multi-threaded applications, the Apple A18 Pro takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U drawing more power under load (9W vs 8W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.
Similar to Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Lower Performance
Intel Pentium P6200 @ 2.13GHz
Single-Thread Rating:857
Multi-Thread Rating:908
View Details
Lower Performance
AMD Phenom II N950 Quad-Core
Single-Thread Rating:859
Multi-Thread Rating:1587
View Details
Lower Performance
AMD A6-1450 APU
Single-Thread Rating:460
Multi-Thread Rating:1072
View Details