CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 2.20GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 787.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 10176.2% advantage
The Intel Celeron 2.20GHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron 2.20GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2009

Market Position

4829th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4558th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1401st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.20GHz

355

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.20GHz

147

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 2.20GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron 2.20GHz

2.20GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Mobile Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.20GHz

2.20GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.2 GHz

2.20GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.20GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

2.20GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

N/A

2.20GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

N/A

2.20GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

N/A

2.20GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron 2.20GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Celeron 2.20GHz leads in single-thread performance, which is crucial for gaming and everyday tasks.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron 2.20GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron 2.20GHz drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.