CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 168.6%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 922.1% advantage
The Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz has the highest core count with 2 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q1 2016

Market Position

3363rd fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs2856th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs802nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

2.00GHz

1,173

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

2.00GHz

1,478

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz

2.00GHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 3955U @ 2.00GHz

2.00GHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

2.0 GHz

2.00GHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

2.00GHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

2 Threads: 2

2.00GHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

FCBGA1356

2.00GHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

15 W

2.00GHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 2 x 32 KBL1 Data Cache: 2 x 32 KBL2 Cache: 2 x 256 KBL3 Cache: 2 MB

2.00GHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the Intel Celeron 3955U @ 2.00GHz drawing more power under load (15W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.