CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz
Key Findings
- The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 33.1%
- In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 28.8% advantage
Performance Rankings & Market Position
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Release Date
Q2 2024
Market Position
890th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs201st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz
Release Date
Q4 2022
Market Position
1089th fastest in multithreading
4890 CPUs988th fastest in single threading
4890 CPUs251st fastest in
1434 Laptop CPUs
Performance
Single-Thread Performance
164U
3,151
GHz
2,367
Multi-Thread Performance
164U
15,106
GHz
11,727
Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz
💻CPU Model
Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
164U
Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz
GHz
🔄Other Names
Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U
164U
Microsoft SQ3
GHz
âš¡Base Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
GHz
🚀Turbo Clock
N/A
164U
N/A
GHz
💻Cores/Threads
N/A
164U
N/A
GHz
🔌Socket
FCBGA2551
164U
N/A
GHz
âš¡TDP
9 W
164U
N/A
GHz
💾Cache
N/A
164U
N/A
GHz
The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.
For multi-threaded applications, the Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.
Power consumption differs significantly, with the Microsoft SQ3 @ 3.0 GHz drawing more power under load (NaNW vs NaNW). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.
Similar to Intel Core Ultra 7 164U
Better Performance
AMD Ryzen 7 4800HS
Single-Thread Rating:2574
Multi-Thread Rating:18330
View Details
Lower Performance
VIA Nano X2 U4025 @ 1.2 GHz
Single-Thread Rating:298
Multi-Thread Rating:400
View Details
Lower Performance
Intel Pentium T2130 @ 1.86GHz
Single-Thread Rating:583
Multi-Thread Rating:382
View Details