CPU Comparison: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz

Key Findings

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U leads in single-threaded performance by up to 1054.2%
In multi-threaded workloads, the Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior performance with a 6247.1% advantage
The VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz has the highest core count with 1 cores

Performance Rankings & Market Position

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

Laptop

Release Date

Q2 2024

Market Position

890th fastest in multithreading

4890 CPUs455th fastest in single threading

4890 CPUs201st fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz

Laptop

Release Date

Q3 2012

Market Position

4694th fastest in multithreading

4891 CPUs4719th fastest in single threading

4891 CPUs1332nd fastest in

1434 Laptop CPUs

Performance

Single-Thread Performance

164U

3,151

L2007@1600MHz

273

Multi-Thread Performance

164U

15,106

L2007@1600MHz

238

Specifications: Intel Core Ultra 7 164U vs VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz

💻CPU Model

Intel Core Ultra 7 164U

164U

VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz

L2007@1600MHz

🔄Other Names

Intel(R) Core(TM) Ultra 7 164U

164U

VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz

L2007@1600MHz

⚡Base Clock

N/A

164U

1.6 GHz

L2007@1600MHz

🚀Turbo Clock

N/A

164U

N/A

L2007@1600MHz

💻Cores/Threads

N/A

164U

1 Threads: 1

L2007@1600MHz

🔌Socket

FCBGA2551

164U

BGA400

L2007@1600MHz

⚡TDP

9 W

164U

25 W

L2007@1600MHz

💾Cache

N/A

164U

L1 Instruction Cache: 1 x 64 KBL1 Data Cache: 1 x 64 KBL2 Cache: 1 x 1024 KB

L2007@1600MHz

The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U and VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz compete in the Laptop segment. The Intel Core Ultra 7 164U shows superior single-thread performance, making it better for tasks like gaming and light workloads.

For multi-threaded applications, the VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz takes the lead, despite having the same core count.

Power consumption differs significantly, with the VIA Nano L2007@1600MHz drawing more power under load (25W vs 9W). This may impact system thermal design and power supply requirements.